|
|
Mark Gwozdecky
|
WASHINGTON,
Feb. 22--A team from the International Atomic Energy Agency conducted a routine inspection of Natanz this month and said it found no evidence of IranÕs weapons program.
"Natanz is a frozen facility," said Mark Gwozdecky, an IAEA spokesman in Vienna. "The inspectors' job is to ensure that the suspension is in force."
The United States and other Western governments are not so sure about the Natanz facility, about 160 miles south of Tehran, USATODAY.com reported.
One reason is that Iran has refused to give IAEA inspectors visas that would allow them to visit more frequently to check the facility. Delays in providing visas to IAEA inspectors have raised suspicions.
Western officials worry Iran could continue to perfect its centrifuge technology even under the eye of the inspectors.
"Even with intrusive IAEA inspections at Natanz, there is a serious risk that Iran could use its enrichment technology in covert activities," George Tenet, then-CIA director, told Congress in March.
Iran failed last year to get European agreement to continue work on a project for 20 centrifuges at Natanz. In addition, IAEA officials say Iran recently upgraded 164 centrifuges at Natanz and described the operation as routine maintenance, according to the Associated Press.
Hossein Mousavian, a top negotiator with the Europeans on the nuclear issue, says Iran "already has achieved the capability and know-how for all enrichment processes".
It needs enrichment capability to ensure it can supply fuel for a power reactor nearing completion at Bushehr and 20 others it would like to construct, he says.
After the Islamic Revolution in 1979, Germany halted work on the Bushehr reactor, despite the fact Iran had paid billions for it.
As a result, "we have to diversify (uranium) sources," Mousavian says. "We have had a very bad experience with Europe ... No one can guarantee this would not happen again."
Mousavian says Iran will guarantee it is not making weapons.
ÒIt is willing to remain a member of the non-proliferation treaty and give the IAEA access to all nuclear sites,Ó he says.
In return, Iran wants an end to its isolation by Europe and full engagement in political, security, economic and technological fields.
"If we had 100 billion euros in European investment in Iran, and if we had Iranian investment in Europe, Iran would never even think of diverting the nuclear enrichment because the damage would be huge for Iran," he says.
The Bush administration has supported the European efforts but refuses to participate directly.
Philip Gordon, an expert on Europe at the Brookings Institution in Washington, describes the US policy as one of "malevolent neglect".
By not joining the talks, he says, the administration can say "I told you so" if they fail. The Europeans, he says, will say "the reason they failed is because the United States did not join us".
Geoffrey Kemp, an Iran specialist at the Nixon Center, a foreign policy think tank, says US ambivalence will be exploited by the Iranians.
"Without a combined approach with the Europeans, the Iranians will drive a truck between the two sides and come out a winner," he said.
Kemp says the United States should clarify what it is prepared to give Iran in return for indefinite suspension of Iran's enrichment program.
Possible carrots for Iran from the United States: help joining the World Trade Organization; the sale of spare parts for Iran's decrepit fleet of Boeing airliners; and the unfreezing of Iranian assets held in the US.