IranDaily.gif IranDaily.gif
Energy
Thu, May 15, 2008

Advanced Search
ADVERTISING RATES
PDF Edition
Front Page
National
Domestic Economy
Science
Energy
Iranica
Society
World
Middle East
International Economy
Sports
Arts & Culture
RSS
Archive
Little Change in Oil Price
UK to Unveil First Zero-Carbon House

Little Change in Oil Price
100824.jpg
Supplies of distillates in developed countries fell 6.7 percent to 477.6 million barrels in March from last year.
Crude oil was little changed in New York after rising to a record $126.98 a barrel as US refiners may not be meeting demand for distillate fuels such as diesel and heating oil.
Supplies of distillates in developed countries fell 6.7 percent to 477.6 million barrels in March from last year, according to International Energy Agency estimates, Bloomberg reported.
Prices are also being supported after Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad told the state Fars News Agency Iran was reviewing oil output.
“Distillate is carrying the market right now,’’ said Sarah Emerson, managing director of Energy Security Analysis Inc., a consulting firm in Wakefield, Massachusetts. “Latin American demand is up, European supplies are still in deficit and distillate demand is the one area that’s stronger here.’’
Crude oil for June delivery rose 14 cents to $125.94 a barrel at 10:01 a.m. Sydney time in after-hours electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange.
Oil on May 13 rose 1.3 percent to settle at $125.80 a barrel. Nymex futures, which on May 13 touched the highest since trading began in 1983, have more than doubled in the past year.
Iranian Oil Minister Gholamhossein Nozari said on May 13 that a decision on cutting production hadn’t been made. Nozari was commenting on a report citing an unidentified official as saying Iranian output would be cut by between 400,000 barrels a day and 1 million barrels a day starting next month.
“Such a proposal has been made and is being reviewed by experts,’’ Ahmadinejad told Fars, following a conference in Tehran on May 13.
US distillate supplies in the week ended May 2 were 2.6 percent below the five-year average, the Energy Department said May 7. Refiners have struggled to increase diesel output since 2006 when the US Environmental Protection Agency instituted requirements for the fuel to contain less sulfur. “There’s a lot more competition for diesel than we’ve ever seen,’’ said Peter Beutel, president of Cameron Hanover Inc. in New Canaan, Connecticut. “Everyone is competing for the limited supply. We are exporting record amounts of the fuel.’’
The US exported 402,000 barrels of distillate fuel a day in March, the second-highest ever, according to the Energy Department. March is the most recent month for which the department has records.
“There’s continuing concern about the global call on distillate fuels,’’ said John Kilduff, vice president of risk management at MF Global Ltd. in New York. “I don’t know if we are going to see any actual shortage, but we are sure pricing it that way.’’
The IEA, an energy adviser to 27 nations, said global oil supply averaged 86.8 million barrels a day in April, down 400,000 barrels from March.
The agency cut its estimate for 2008 global oil demand by about 390,000 barrels a day to 86.84 million barrels. It was the fourth-straight monthly decline. Demand in both China and the Middle East will rise 4.9 percent, more than making up for a drop in consumption from North America and Europe, the agency said.
Brent crude oil for June settlement rose $1.19, or 1 percent, to settle at $124.10 a barrel on London’s ICE Futures Europe exchange. The contract touched a record $125.90 on May 9.
The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, responsible for more than 40 percent of the world’s oil supply, will hold its next policy-setting meeting in Vienna on Sept. 9. Most members of the 13-nation group have said there is no reason to meet before then because oil supply is sufficient.

UK to Unveil First Zero-Carbon House
The zero-carbon homes of the future should self-generate the vast majority of the energy they use, but a small amount of near-site or off-site renewable generation will also be allowed, a report says today.
According to the Guardian, the UK Green Building Council’s (GBC) new report, The Definition of Zero Carbon, was thrashed out by a range of stakeholders trying to work out a blueprint for the provision of zero-carbon homes from 2016 mandated by the government.
The GBC’s zero-carbon task force was chaired by Mark Clare of Barratt Developments. The company will this week unveil what it claims is the country’s first zero-carbon house from a volume housebuilder.
Environmentalists and construction firms have been debating how to define zero carbon, with greens wanting each house to be zero carbon while the housebuilders argue that could be too expensive or impracticable. They want the flexibility to invest in offshore wind farms, for instance, as part of their commitment to renewable energy on their developments.
The GBC report rules that out, but does say some district heating schemes could be allowed or housebuilders could, in certain circumstances, pay into a community energy pot to fund local projects.
GBC chief executive Paul King said, “The government’s level of ambition is spot on and should be supported 100 percent. This is not about dumbing down or abandoning the concept of zero carbon. This is about ensuring the same high level of carbon savings, but allowing developers more flexibility.“
He stressed that near-site schemes could be approved but only if there was proof that the project was a genuine addition to the country’s renewable-energy provision, and that the energy would be used to power that specific development. Failing that, the developer could pay into a community fund that would ensure equal or greater net carbon savings through new installations.
“The price of paying into the fund should be set at a margin above the cost of community-scale solutions so as to clearly incentivize the installation of on-site or local measures first,“ says the report.
The report, which will feed into the government’s consultation on the definition of zero-carbon homes this year, is likely to be approved as it has been agreed by a range of different interests. Clare said, “The value of this report is reflected in the high degree of consensus reached by many different stakeholders.“
WWF, the charity that has been a key driver behind the government’s zero-carbon homes initiative, said the 2016 target was “eminently achievable“.
Simon McWhirter, WWF’s homes campaign manager, said, “WWF is optimistic that the findings from the Task Group will dispel confusion over the definition of zero carbon, investing more developers with the confidence to build to the very highest levels of sustainability. We hope this will help deliver practical zero-carbon homes well ahead of the 2016 deadlines.“
Zero-carbon homes will be so well insulated they will require very little heating. They would have appliances consuming minimum electricity to be provided by installations such as solar photovoltaic panels or combined heat and power (CHP) plants. The report’s definitions will allow for a single CHP plant to power several adjacent homes.

Power Outages
The Ethiopian capital faces a lengthy power outage until next month because of reduced water levels in the country’s hydroelectric plants. Addis Ababa, a city of five million, will have no power for up to three days a week.

EnergyCol3
StatoilHydro Struggles to Pipe Arctic Gas
100821.jpg
When Norwegian energy giant StatoilHydro fired up the world’s northernmost liquefied natural gas plant here last year it was hailed as an industry pioneer.
But turning Arctic gas into gold has proven anything but simple, AFP reported.
“It is true that we’ve had some problems with the budget, with some of the technology and with CO2 emissions,“ acknowledged Sverre Kojedal, a spokesman for StatoilHydro’s Snoehvit (Snow White) gas field and LNG plant project.
Snoehvit and two satellite gas fields set to feed the brand new LNG plant on the northern Norwegian Melkoeya Island, about 2,000 kilometers from the North Pole, are believed to hold about 193 billion cubic meters of recoverable natural gas.
Statoil, which late last year expanded to become StatoilHydro, has been eager to get at the gas, worth tens of billions of euros, since the field was discovered in the mid-1980s.
The elaborate web of entirely sub-sea equipment located at depths of up to 340 meters and the 145-kilometre (90-mile) pipeline that transports the gas to land before it is liquefied is seen as one of the company’s most prestigious and pioneering projects. It was intended to secure the Norwegian company’s place as a front-runner in the race to extract Arctic oil and gas riches that have become increasingly accessible due to new technologies and because of the effect of global warming on the polar ice cap.

Unforgiving Climate
But building an LNG plant based on brand-new technology in an unforgiving Arctic climate has proven more complicated and far more costly than expected.
StatoilHydro, which owns a 33.5-percent share and operates Snoehvit, and its partners paid nearly 50 percent more than the budgeted 39 billion kroner (7.6 billion dollars, 4.9 billion euros) to build the project, which only came online last September, a year behind schedule.
The company appears to have “sped a bit too quickly through the planning phase,“ Enskilda analyst Arnstein Wigestrand told AFP.
Some of the problems encountered were perhaps to be expected so far north. When a massive storm swept the area under construction in January 2006, sending the mercury on Melkoeya plunging below -20 degrees Celsius for more than a week, some 1,500 workers had to be evacuated.
They were shuttled into nearby Hammerfest, which counts just 9,500 inhabitants, sending town officials scurrying to find accommodation.
With not enough houses to hold them, nearly half the workers ended up bunking on a passing coastal cruiser.
And when production finally began the flares used to release pressure spewed an unexpected cloud of soot over the entire region, including Hammerfest, riling locals and causing concern among environmentalists already wary of the effect of energy production on the vulnerable Arctic ecosystem.
“There was some soot ... and of course people didn’t like it,“ Kojedal said, standing in the heat of one of two huge flares overlooking the snow-blanketed industrial complex that covers the entire one-square-kilometer island.

Start-Up Time
The plant has since reduced its start-up time from three weeks to about six hours and greatly reduced the amount of soot released in the flaring process, he said.
Asle Roenning of WWF Norway said the Melkoeya soot cloud was not only a local nuisance but also ’unfortunate’ from a global warming perspective.
“One of the contributing factors mentioned when it comes to the melting of the polar ice cap is soot, often from ships in northern waters,“ he told AFP, pointing out that soot-lined ice could not deflect sun rays as efficiently, thus raising temperatures.
Environmentalists are especially critical of soaring carbon dioxide emissions from the new LNG plant.
According to Norwegian media reports, it spewed out 10-months worth of CO2 emissions--some 1.1 million tons, or about 2.0 percent of Norway’s overall annual carbon emissions--in the first two months of production alone.
“It is unfortunate that StatoilHydro ahead of time described how they mastered the technology part and would only emit so much,“ said WWF Norway climate and gas advisor Arild Skedsmo.
“Now, after they have spent nearly 60 billion kroner to develop this, it is very hard (for the authorities) to say they can’t emit an extra ton because of their technical problems,“ he added.
At a financial level, observers say the Melkoeya plant has been hemorrhaging money since the get-go.
The facility, plagued by technical problems, has remained shut down for long periods and, when it is up and running produces no more than about 60 percent of an anticipated full capacity of some 20 million standard cubic meters of gas (SCM) per day.
As seagulls pitch overhead in the sub-zero spring wind and icy dark waves crash against black rocks below, Kojedal points out that Snoehvit is the first ever offshore project and first gas development in the Barents Sea.
“Being an industry pioneer means a lot to take care of,“ he said.