IranDaily
Number 3135 - Sun, May 25, 2008 - Khordad 05 1387- Jamadi Al-Ula 19 1429

Advanced Search
ADVERTISING RATES
PDF Edition
Front Page
National
Domestic Economy
Science
Energy
Iranica
Society
World
Middle East
International Economy
Sports
Arts & Culture
RSS
Archive

Weather Guide
Tehran
High: 34 - Low: 18

095841.jpg Chabahar

095838.jpg Gorgan

095841.jpg Ilam

095841.jpg Qazvin

095841.jpg Shiraz

095841.jpg Baghdad

095841.jpg Baku

095838.jpg Islamabad

095844.jpg London

095841.jpg Seoul

Identification
Published by the Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA)

Address:
Iran Cultural & Press Institute, #212 Khorramshahr Avenue Tehran/Iran

Chief Editor:
Amir Ali Abolfath

Editorial Dept. Tel: 88755761-2

Editorial Dept. Fax: 88761869

Subscription Dept. Tel: 88329002-4

Advertising Dept. Tel: 88500616-7

Internet Address:
www.iran-daily.com

E-mail Address:
iran-daily@iran-daily.com
Strong Opposition
To Proposed US-Iraq Deal
Iraq’s most influential Shiite cleric Grand Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Sistani expressed his strong opposition to the proposed Iraq-US security agreement.
According to a senior aide of Ayatollah Sistani, the Shiite leader said in a meeting with Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri Al-Maliki that he would not allow such an agreement to be concluded with US occupiers as long as he is alive.
The security agreement is aimed at replacing the current UN mandate for foreign troops in Iraq.
102447.jpg
Ayatollah Sistani has reportedly said that the agreement should secure the interests of the Iraqi people and not the opposite, because the coming generations will be committed to it.
The top Iraqi cleric, however, reiterated his support for Maliki’s democratically-elected government and efforts to restore peace and security to the country.
In reply to a question on his website, the Grand Ayatollah said, “Changing the tyrannical (Saddam Hussein) regime by invasion and occupation was not what we wished for because of the many tragedies they have created.“
“We are extremely worried about their intentions,“ he wrote in response to another question on his views about the US military presence.
Meanwhile, a senior Iranian official has blasted the US-led occupation forces in Iraq for trying to secure unlimited domination over the war-torn country.
Ali Akbar Velayati, an advisor to the leader of the Islamic Revolution on international affairs, warned that the planned US-Iraqi security agreement would prolong US presence in Iraq and leave the country in a woeful condition.
Velyati termed the accord the “law of domination“, saying the US is resorting to “various plots to secure an unlimited control over Iraq for itself and the Zionists“.
Washington has drawn up a Status of Forces Agreement and is currently negotiating its terms with Baghdad.
The deal will give a legal basis to the presence of American troops in Iraq after December 31 when the UN resolution mandating their current status expires.
“If signed, the accord, proposed by the Americans to the Iraqi government, would plunge Iraq and the region into a disastrous situation,“ Velayati warned.
“This act of conspiracy is dangerous for Iraq. This important country, home to a number of Muslim holy sites, should not be brought under the domination of the enemies of Islam.“
The Iranian official said the 12-paragraph accord provides an unlimited presence and military operation for the US troops in Iraq.
The deal also allows the US military to build 14 permanent military bases in Iraq, while the occupation forces can arrest any individual deemed a threat to the occupiers.
“The accord stipulates that Iraq’s ministries of intelligence, defense and interior will operate under US supervision for 10 years,“ Velayati said.
According to the official, Iraqi tribunals will not have the authority to judge military personnel and employees of firms working for the US military.
The deal will also give the US the right to use the country as a base for attacking other states in the region.
Velyati called on Iraqi religious scholars to take serious measures to block the deal, “as they have done before over the Iraqi Constitution and elections.“

Meshaal MeetsMottaki, Jalili
Israel Cannot Set Conditions for Golan Pullout
Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki said the Zionist regime is not in a position to set conditions for withdrawing from Golan Heights.
Mottaki made the remark at a joint press conference with the head of Hamas political bureau, Khaled Meshaal, at the Foreign Ministry building on Saturday.
“Under the current circumstances, the Zionist regime has no option but to withdraw from occupied lands, including occupied Palestine,“ Mottaki said. The Iranian minister stressed that Tehran backs Damascus in its drive to retake Golan Heights.
During talks with Meshaal, the two sides strongly condemned the Zionists’ atrocities and underlined the need to put an end to Gaza’s siege. Meshaal, for his part, said 11,600 Palestinians have been arrested by the Zionist regime in the Gaza Strip.
“Some 160 civilians have been killed in Gaza and 11,000 have lost their jobs,“ he said.
On Golan Heights, he said, “We support the liberation of Golan Heights as well as other occupied lands and believe that Syria should retake its own land and not compromise on the rights of the Palestinian nation.“
“Nobody should trust the Zionist regime,“ he said, adding that Syria will remain committed to the legitimate rights of Palestinians and Arabs. In a meeting with Meshaal, Iran’s Supreme National Security Council Secretary Saeed Jalili said the Zionist regime’s atrocities against the innocent Palestinian nation indicate weakness of the occupation regime and its allies.
Jalili praised the consistent resistance of Palestinian people, saying that the Zionists’ refusal to hold a referendum in Palestine proves their fake claims to support democracy.
The senior Iranian official said the firm determination of Hamas to defend the rights of Palestinians is the key reason for its popularity.
Meshaal, for his part, said the siege of Gaza is today the prime violation of human rights in the world.
102306.jpg Warning Images for Cigarette Packs
Continue...
102309.jpg Afghans Furious at US Whitewash
Continue...
102336.jpg European Leaders Call for Nuclear Revival
Continue...
102327.jpg Iran’s Particles Research Significant
Physics Nobel Laureate in Tehran
Continue...
102339.jpg Saipa Relieved
On Avoiding Urawa
Continue...
102423.jpg Private Capital Fueling
Sub-Saharan Africa Growth
Continue...
102453.jpg Pakistan to Extradite Terrorists
Continue...
102450.jpg US Needs Direct Talks
Continue...
Perspec
Innovative Initiatives
By Armin Hedayati
In recent years, Iran has placed adoption of innovative initiatives on the agenda of its foreign policy apparatus. One such initiative is presentation of the package of proposals for resolving a number of pressing global problems.
A scrutiny of the package leads to clarification of a few points. The package, even without heeding its very nature, hints at Iran’s constructive role in international developments. The issue becomes more important when the attempts of some countries for distorting Iran’s image by alleging that Iran has a destructive role in global and regional developments are examined. Undoubtedly a country that wants to disturb global peace and stability does not present proposals for holding dialogue vis-ˆ-vis political and economic issues.
Iran has presented constructive proposals in the package. Among the proposals, formation of a consortium for producing fuel in various parts of the world, including Iran, is one of the main pivots. Obviously, heeding this issue will not only help break the deadlock regarding the West’s concern about Iran’s peaceful nuclear program, but will also help resolve the global problem of procuring inexpensive and sustainable energy.
At present, the world economy depends on procuring energy from nuclear fuel more than at any other time. While every barrel of oil is currently traded at the unexpectedly record high of $130, the world must speedily expand utilization of atomic energy.
Amid this, Iran’s valuable experience in gaining access to indigenous nuclear technology can be made available to other countries under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Another point deserves a mention here and that being establishment of an international consortium for producing fuel in Iran can help promote mutual trust in the course of negotiations between Iran and Group 5+1.
Upon the formation of such a consortium, Iran will be assured that it will always have its needed fuel for atomic power plants and countries that export fuel will not be able to exert pressures. Furthermore, production of nuclear fuel within the framework of a consortium on Iranian territory helps remove any worries of the international community about Iran’s diversion from peaceful purposes to military applications.
Given the existing mechanisms, Iran will not be able to transcend the peaceful plans for producing enriched uranium with a specific grade.
At any rate, Iran’s package can interact with the package proposed by Group 5+1, yielding a solution that would be of interest and value for both the sides. Subsequentl y, any unconventional insistence of the West in relation to cessation of nuclear fuel production, which violates international accords such as the Non-Proliferation Treaty, will be viewed as an unfriendly move and the cause of unwanted tension by Tehran.