|
Weather Guide
|
Tehran
High: 34 - Low: 21

Abadan
Arak

Ardebil
Bam

Khorramshahr

Shiraz

Beijing

Cairo

Jeddah

Khartoum

Manama

Rome
|
|
Identification
|
|
Published by the Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA)
Address:
Iran Cultural & Press Institute, #212 Khorramshahr Avenue Tehran/Iran
Chief Editor:
Amir Ali Abolfath
Editorial Dept. Tel: 88755761-2
Editorial Dept. Fax: 88761869
Subscription Dept. Tel: 88329002-4
Advertising Dept. Tel: 88500616-7
Internet Address:
www.iran-daily.com
E-mail Address:
iran-daily@iran-daily.com
|
|
|
|
|
Industries Top Export List
|
|
Industrialists and officials pose for a photograph on the occasion of "Industries and Mines Day" in Tehran on Monday. (Photo by Adel Paziar)
|
First Vice President Parviz Davoudi said the industrial sector plays a pivotal role in implementing the outlines of Vision 2025 and 56 percent of exports pertain to this sector.
Addressing a meeting themed “Industries and Mines Day“ on Monday, Davoudi added that industrialists have employed all their material and spiritual assets for the advancement of the Islamic Republic and prefer the interests of the country over their personal interests, Fars News Agency reported.
He evaluated the role of industrialists in wealth generation as “very effective“.
“Iran deserves such selflessness (of its industrialists) and the outlook of Vision 2025 accords a lofty status to our country at the regional and international levels,“ he said.
Davoudi emphasized that given the dynamism of industrialists, the objectives of Vision 2025 are expected to be fulfilled sooner than 20 years.
“Growth, along with dispensation of justice, is the main target of Vision 2025 which we must achieve at the least cost and through the creativity of industrialists. Employment, justice, welfare and less dependence on oil revenues as well as removal of poverty are contingent upon production and higher efficiency. These points have been underlined in Vision 2025,“ he said.
The official also said that the private sector should handle economic affairs and the government should only play a supervisory role.
Davoudi declared that the industrial sector has the largest growth rate.
“This sector must reach a level where it accounts for over 40 percent of value-added,“ he said.
He added that the government pays special attention to the growth of industrial sector and said the plan for economic change accelerates advancement of the country as well as the industrial sector.
Davoudi urged the Ministry of Industries and Mines to enter the scene as the greatest supporter of the private and cooperative sectors, and assume a decisive role in implementing outlines of Article 44 of the constitution.
|
|
|
President Defends Profit-Intensive Schemes
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on Monday some of the opposition to the plan for implementing profit-intensive economic schemes is because of its success, as the plan has so far generated two million jobs, Fars News Agency reported.
Speaking in a meeting with a group of Isfahan MPs in his series of meetings with lawmakers of different provinces, the president said, “The government seeks improvement of conditions of all provinces. Although Isfahan has a more favorable status compared to other provinces, this does not necessarily imply that there is no deprivation in Isfahan. The government is doing its best to minimize all deprivations.“
The chief executive expressed his satisfaction over the decisive votes of the MPs to the drought bill and said this has changed the overall climate and gave people more hope.
Ahmadinejad underlined that implementation of profit-intensive economic schemes is a solution to unemployment.
Isfahan’s legislators lauded the government’s efforts and expressed concerns about machinations against them, voicing their preparedness to assist the government for overcoming various problems.
|
|
|
Hamas Hopeful of Qantar Release
|
|
Mahmoud Zahar
|
A Hamas leader said Israel’s agreement to release a notorious Lebanese militant may provide an opening to free members convicted of killing Israelis.
Mahmoud Zahar also said Hamas should take advantage of Israel’s decision “to release people whom Israel accused of having blood on their hands, like Samir Kantar,“ AP reported.
The Lebanese Kantar is serving multiple life sentences for his part in a 1979 attack that killed an Israeli man, his two daughters and two policemen.
The Israeli government approved his release on Sunday in a swap deal with the Hezbollah militant group, in return for the bodies of two Israeli soldiers.
Hamas is negotiating with Israel over an Israeli soldier held since 2006. Israel has refused to release many of the prisoners Hamas wants in return, saying they were involved in killing Israelis.
|
|
|
Secret US Plan for Pakistan on Hold
Top Bush administration officials drafted a secret plan late last year to make it easier for US Special Operations forces to operate inside Pakistan’s tribal areas, but Washington turf battles and the diversion of resources to Iraq have held up the effort, the New York Times reported on Monday.
The newspaper quoted a senior Defense Department official as saying there was “mounting frustration“ in Pentagon at the continued delay in deployment of special operations teams into Pakistan’s mountainous and lawless western tribal regions, where senior Al-Qaeda operatives are thought to be hiding.
The report, based on more than four dozen interviews in Washington and Pakistan, said Al-Qaeda’s new safe haven in Pakistan was in part due to the administration’s accommodation to Pakistan’s President Pervez Musharraf, whose advisers have long played down the terrorist threat.
It was also a story, the report concluded, of infighting between US intelligence agencies and a shift in White House priorities from counter-terrorism efforts in Afghanistan and Pakistan to the war in Iraq.
The Times quoted a retired CIA officer as estimating that Al-Qaeda training compounds in Pakistan now host as many as 2,000 local and foreign militants, up from several hundred three years ago.
Infighting within the CIA included battles between field officers in Kabul and Islamabad, and the counter-terrorism center at CIA headquarters in Virginia whose preference for carrying out raids remotely, via Predator missiles strikes, was derided by field officers as the work of “boys with toys“, the Times reported.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As EU Fades
By A. Khalili
Mehdi Safari, deputy foreign minister for European affairs, recently said that Europe is missing opportunities to cooperate with Iran while the strategic importance of Middle East and especially Iran, as a lucrative market is on the rise.
Until the recent past, Europe was viewed as Iran’s top trading partner, but now that has changed as Asia takes its place without the shackles of colonialism, arrogance, greed or lowly cultures.
Although ties between Iran and Europe date back centuries and Iran is among the first powers to have broadened ties with the European Union (EU), two-way interaction has after the 1979 Islamic Revolution era had more than its share of ups and downs.
Experts on both sides concur that Tehran and Brussels need strong bilateral bonds. However, extended absence of a free and independent EU foreign policy and key
European powers perpetually siding with America (including on highly sensitive and controversial issues) have created conditions wherein the long normal ties have been sacrificed at the altar of political profit.
From the mid-1990s when Washington tightened its unilateral sanctions against Iran,
European companies replaced American firms in Iran’s development projects. In the meantime, the strong EU opposition to the US embargo resulted in the gradual expansion of Iran-EU ties obviously in the interest of both sides.
However, after a while some quarters in Brussels decided to give a political slant to the relations with the Islamic state. In the process, they attempted to draw heavily on economic factors for exerting political pressure on Tehran. Such unacceptable policy and pressure compelled Iran in the late 1990s to change course and look East.
As time passed Asian companies saw the new economic opening and started to replace the Europeans in Iran’s major economic sectors, energy in particular.
When the nuclear issue emerged, reality struck and EU weakness in decision-making became all the more apparent. In recent years, whenever experts expressed guarded optimism that nuclear talks with the EU would produce positive results, their hope turned into fantasy as most negotiations ended in stalemate, due primarily to the destructive US interference.
With Britain, France and Germany rushing into the Bush enclave over the dispute, EU weakness, vulnerability and lack of vision became an open secret for the free peoples of the world.
Since American companies were barred from participating in Iranian projects due to sanctions, Washington went out of its way to ensure that European enterprises were also kept far away from the Iranian market. It is amply clear that the US does not want the EU to become a self-reliant powerhouse when it comes to resolving major international problems. No wonder it continues to place hurdles in the way of finding a mutually acceptable solution to the nuclear case.
The systemic absence of EU self-determination in international relations has given Tehran all the more reason to work closely with Asia. Today the informed Iranian more than ever mistrusts Europe. Rulers and the ruled in Iran had expected that at the least the European powers defend Iran’s inalienable right to acquire civilian nuclear technology. But with last week’s sanction against Bank Melli of Iran (BMI) the EU once again demonstrated that when it comes to the Middle East and Iran they prefer to stand behind their American cousins.
Iran’s Ambassador in Paris Ali Ahani recently said that the EU decision to blacklist the BMI speaks volumes. The European side with the all the rhetoric simply lacks good intent, he was quoted as saying.
With Europe making haste in banning the most important and influential Iranian bank, Asian banks will soon step in and do the needful without much hassle. Furthermore, Iranian assets/holdings in Europe will be either transferred back to Iran or moved to Asian banks. Economic and financial sanctions are being imposed on Iran even though
European companies and industries seek expansion in two-way collaboration.
In view of Iran’s declared intent to diversify trade and economic ties, Asian firms will be a suitable substitute for their European counterparts now in the process of fading away from the Iranian economic landscape. Asians normally operate without strings attached and avoid using (abusing) economic relations as a tool to elicit political and other concessions as has become the norm in Brussels.
|
|
|
|
|
|