1231 GMT February 24, 2020
James Brokenshire, who appointed in April by Prime Minister Theresa May, said Monday that Conservative Party policies may be to blame for a surge in rough-sleeping in Britain.
He said in an interview with the website Politico that Tory party members needed to ask themselves “some very hard questions” about why levels of homelessness had increased so significantly in the UK since 2010, when the government began imposing cuts on social care budget as part of wider austerity program, Presstv Reported.
Brokenshire also revealed he personally does not give money to homeless people, although he said he sometimes buys the Big Issue, a street newspaper sold by homeless individuals.
The interview appeared to contradict his remarks earlier this month, when the minister said rising homelessness was not a political failure.
“I don’t see it in those terms,” Brokenshire said. “I see it as a combination of concerning elements in terms of addiction, family breakdown issues. The thing that struck me over recent months in speaking to some of the LGBT charities in terms of young people, because of their sexuality, being thrown out of home.”
The comments came after Crisis, a major charity organization, published results of its study on homelessness in the UK on Sunday, saying the number of rough-sleepers in the country had increased by nearly 100 percent in five years to reach a whopping figure of 12,300 cases last year.
The charity said that some 170,000 British families and individuals will experience the worst forms of rough-sleeping during Christmas.
UK authorities have repeatedly denied that austerity and a new government scheme on social care, known as Universal Credit, which seeks to cut many old benefits, has had any role in increased poverty in Britain.
Brokenshire himself had said in an interview to the Guardian newspaper earlier this month that the spread of psychoactive substances, growth in the number of non-UK nationals on the streets and family breakdown were main factors for increase in homelessness and not the government’s way of treating poverty.